Is Warrant-less Spying on New Zealanders Lawful?   22 Aug 2014

Article - Denis Tegg

Is Warrant-less Spying on New Zealanders Lawful?

15 August, 2014

We have been repeatedly assured by the Prime Minister that the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) cannot spy on New Zealanders without a warrant. But what if the greatly enhanced knowledge we have gained from Edward Snowden’s disclosures of mass global surveillance, has actually left New Zealanders nakedly exposed to lawful warrant-less spying on their internet communications by the GCSB? That perverse and deeply disturbing outcome for New Zealander’s privacy and democratic freedoms has been overlooked by commentators on state surveillance since the GCSB Act was passed in September 2013.

The Snowden revelations of the last twelve months now mean that most of us have greatly increased expectations that our emails, phone calls and online activity will be intercepted. A Stuff.co.nz/Ipsos poll, of 21 June 2014 shows 71.6 % of New Zealanders believe United States spy agencies are gathering data on them.

These raised expectations that our communications will be intercepted, now profoundly affects the legal interpretation of a critical phrase - "private communications", in the GCSB Act. The phrase is critical because it is supposed to provide protection for New Zealanders against the GCSB’s intelligence gathering powers (section 8B), and warrant-less interception powers (section 16).

Under the GCSB Act a communication can only be "private", and therefore protected from interception, if one of the parties has a "reasonable expectation" that their communication will not be intercepted by some other person. A “reasonable expectation” in this context is not about privacy in the wider meaning of that term, or about loss of privacy. Defining “reasonable expectation” in the GCSB Act requires a much narrower and focused enquiry – as to whether the communication will be intercepted. It is irrelevant whether the interception occurs overseas, or within New Zealand.

The Snowden revelations have helped turn this critical phrase in the GCSB Act, which is supposed to safeguard our democratic freedoms and privacy, into a contrivance which now works contrarily to largely extinguish those protections. Lawful warrant-less surveillance of New Zealanders by the GCSB is possible.

No amount of oversight after the event can protect the public, if the GCSB is lawfully exploiting a legal loophole.

Would the public ever know that the GCSB was exploiting these legal flaws in this manner? The answer is they would not. The GCSB's legal advice and internal operations are kept highly secret.If the interception of everyday communications is deemed by the GCSB to be not private, and therefore legal, then no warrant is required from either the Prime Minister or The Commissioner of Security Warrants. Warrant-less interception is possible, no register need be kept, and any audit by the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security would confirm legal compliance. The GCSB could also lawfully request any Five Eyes partners or other foreign intelligence agency to share data it holds on New Zealanders.

The Government has known about this legal loophole, but has deliberately chosen not to close it. In 2010, the Law Commission Stage 3 Report on Privacy pointed out that the definition of "private communication" in the criminal law was outdated and seriously flawed.

In June 2013, submissions from the New Zealand Law Society, and Appeal Court Judge Sir Grant Hammond on behalf of the Legislation Advisory Committee, both raised serious concerns about the phrase "private communications" in the GCSB Bill. Sir Grant took his concerns to the media, where he stated -

“the definition of the term "private communications" within the protection clause of the bill was not clear and, because it was central to the protections in the bill, it needed further work.

"It's a trigger provision. A lot of other things turn on it. "

Both the Law Society and Sir Grant strongly submitted that the phrase be strengthened to take account of changes in technology, and community expectations of privacy.

“The LAC suggests that the definition of “private communication” be revised to better reflect the level of communications, information and data privacy that New Zealanders may reasonably expect.”

The Prime Minister’s Office acknowledged that New Zealander’s metadata and content, would not always meet the legal test for a “private” communication, and could in some circumstances be intercepted.

But the Government would not agree to delay the Bill until a precise and protective definition was established. Instead the Bill was rushed through Parliament with a two vote majority – including that of MP Peter Dunne. Mr. Dunne gave his support in return for a commitment from the Government to review the definition of "private communication”, stating this is “what I have ensured will happen as a priority”. A year later, the review has not even begun, and the Government has delayed any review indefinitely.

Edward Snowden has stated that New Zealand was one of the countries to which the US and UK spy agencies provided "legal guidance" on how to degrade its legal protections and enable mass surveillance. In written testimony to the European Parliament, Snowden said,

“Lawyers from the NSA, as well as the UK's GCHQ, work very hard to search for loopholes in laws and constitutional protections that they can use to justify indiscriminate, dragnet surveillance operations that were at best unwittingly authorized by lawmakers. These efforts to interpret new powers out of vague laws is an intentional strategy to avoid public opposition”

This context explains why the Government has rushed through radical changes to the GCSB Act knowing full well that a critical definition was deeply flawed, and explains why it has then reneged on a promised “urgent” review and delayed it indefinitely. The intention is clear – the GCSB wishes to retain the current definition of “private communications and with it - “loopholes in laws and constitutional protections that they can use to justify indiscriminate, dragnet surveillance operations”

We know from Snowden’s disclosures that the NSA, with assistance from its 'Five Eyes' spy partners, - UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, now intercepts (and in some cases stores) emails, calls and internet activity on a global basis. 95% of all New Zealand’s internet traffic passes, via the Southern Cross undersea cable to the US, where it may be lawfully intercepted, as “foreign intelligence”. In many cases this will include communications between two people in New Zealand.

The NSA has “Network Security Agreements” with scores of cable companies worldwide, including Telstra in Australia. These agreements compel the cable companies to grant access to all the data on their cables when they land on US territory. Telecom New Zealand, which half owns the Southern Cross cable, has confirmed that once its cable entered US territory, it is legally obliged to co-operate with US laws.

One of Snowden’s documents suggests that the NSA has a broad no-spying agreement with New Zealand and the other “Second Party”/Five Eyes partners. But as this NSA flowchart makes clear – spying on citizens of “Second Party” nations such as New Zealand is possible with “additional approval.” In other documents released by Snowden, the phone, internet and email records of UK citizens not suspected of any wrongdoing have been analysed and stored by the NSA under a secret deal with UK intelligence officials.

The Snowden revelations have confirmed that the spy agencies -

- have direct access to Google, Apple, Facebook and Yahoo data

- intercept data on fibre optic cables on a global scale

- unlock encryption, and monitor banking and credit card information

- collect email address books and millions of text messages daily

- may target NZ citizens without NZ Government knowledge or consent

- infect computer hardware with malicious malware to allow spying

- intercept web cam and other images

- collect and store phone conversations for whole nations “word for word”

The mission of the Five Eyes partners has been articulated in a briefing as mass surveillance where globally, the spy agencies - "know it all, partner it all, collect it all, and exploit it all.”

Some might believe that the GCSB would never attempt to exploit a loophole in the law in this manner. The legal stance taken by the US and UK intelligence agencies suggests otherwise.

The US authorities recently successfully contended in court that customers of Lavabit, an encrypted email service, still did not have a reasonable expectation that their emails would not be intercepted.

The US Department of Justice has just argued in another case before the US courts that,

"the privacy rights of US persons in international communications are significantly diminished, if not completely eliminated, when those communications have been transmitted to or obtained from non-US persons located outside the United States".

A loophole allowing the NSA to carry out warrant-less spying on Americans has been revealed in this Washington Post article.

The US Government also argues that Americans cannot expect that their private communications will not be intercepted by the NSA, when intelligence services of so many other countries might be monitoring those communications too.

In the UK, Britain’s top counter-terrorism official has been forced by a legal challenge to attempt to legally justifying the unwarranted mass surveillance of every Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google user in the UK. The legal sophistry advanced includes suggesting that two British users messaging each other on Facebook are not communicating with each other but with the Facebook “platform”. Even when privacy violations happen, it is not an “active intrusion” because the analyst reading or listening to an individual’s communication will inevitably “forget” about it anyway.

When the US and UK authorities use such dubious legal justifications, we should not be surprised if the GCSB interprets New Zealand law to facilitate warrant-less interception of our emails, phone calls and online activity.

Assume that the GCSB has targeted a prominent New Zealand citizen for surveillance. This person has a clean criminal record and no links to any terrorist or cybercriminal group. People with a similar profile have been subject to surveillance in the US.

A GCSB intelligence analyst has access to a NSA-developed computer data search program called XKeyscore. XKeyscore enables a single search to query “all unfiltered data”, including mass harvested email addresses, phone numbers, online chat, social media activity, web-based email and attachments, sent to or stored at 150 global sites, on 700 database servers. Disclosures confirm that GCSB staff has been briefed on the use of XKeyscore, and that at least one XKeyscore terminal is located in New Zealand.

A Five Eyes 2010 guide explains that analysts can begin surveillance on anyone by clicking a few simple pull-down menus designed to provide both legal and targeting justifications. The analyst clicks on "Target has no reasonable expectation that communications will not be intercepted - not a private communication" and retrieves the data.

While the GCSB and the Inspector-General may possibly carry out audits of such searches, the GCSB Act does not compel either of them to make public any record of warrant-less interceptions, which are deemed to be lawful.

We know that the GCSB bungled the Dotcom case by unlawfully spying on a New Zealand resident. The Kitteridge Report identified legal non-compliance as the root cause of its failings.

New Zealander’s privacy and democratic freedoms will always remain under threat from non-compliance. But the real danger lies right under our noses in the revised GCSB Act, and in the exploitation of acknowledged loopholes which permit lawful warrant-less surveillance of New Zealanders.

The solution is clear. The GCSB must release its internal legal manuals, and the legal opinions it has received. The USA’s spy agency did so in November 2013. Carefully crafted semantics, denials and obfuscation from the GCSB and the Prime Minister will not suffice. Only when the public have seen the legal manuals and opinions can they judge whether or not the GCSB considers it has the power to lawfully spy on New Zealanders without a warrant.

Add a comment

News

Hilary Timmins' Award-Winning UK Documentary Series To Inspire NZ Students

29 Jun 2020 Education
Dream Catchers, produced and directed by Hilary Timmins, celebrates the success stories of more than thirty inspirational New... more

New Zealand reaffirms support for Flight MH17 judicial process

7 Mar 2020 News By Rt HON WINSTON PETERS
Ahead of the start of the criminal trial in the Netherlands on 9 March, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has reaffirmed the need to... more

Business

NZ Government's Economic package to fight COVID-19

17 Mar 2020 Business News By RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
The Coalition Government has launched the most significant peace-time economic plan in modern New Zealand history to cushion the... more

NZ Government announces aviation relief package

19 Mar 2020 Business News By Hon Phil Twyford
Transport Minister Phil Twyford today outlined the first tranche of the $600 million aviation sector relief package announced earlier... more

Living

Diversity was Key at New Zealand Trade Tasting in London

6 Jun 2022 Food & Wine
New Zealand Winegrowers Annual Trade Tasting was recently held in London, on Wednesday 4 May, in Lindley Hall. It was the first... more

Kiwi author stuns Behind the Butterfly Gate

12 Jan 2022 Arts By Charlotte Everett
Hidden behind the Butterfly Gate is where the secret has been kept for 76 years...  New Zealand writer Merryn Corcoran’s... more

Property

Fairer rules for tenants and landlords

17 Nov 2019 Property By Minister Kris Faafoi
17 NOVEMBER 2019 The Government has delivered on its promise to the over one million New Zealanders who now rent to make it fairer... more

New Zealand Government will not implement a Capital Gains Tax

17 Apr 2019 Property By RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
The Coalition Government will not proceed with the Tax Working Group’s recommendation for a capital gains tax, Jacinda Ardern... more

Migration

Boosting border security with electronic travel authority – now over 500,000 issued

19 Nov 2019 Migration By Hon Iain Lees-Galloway
19 NOVEMBER 2019 We’ve improved border security with the NZeTA, New Zealand Electronic Travel Authority, which helps us to... more

Christchurch reinstated as refugee settlement location

18 Aug 2018 Migration
18 AUGUST 2018 HON IAIN LEES-GALLOWAY The announcement that Christchurch can once again be a settlement location for refugees... more

Travel

Gallipoli Anzac Day services cancelled

19 Mar 2020 Travel & Tourism By RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
The New Zealand and Australian Governments have announced this year’s joint Anzac Day services at Gallipoli will be cancelled... more

New Zealanders advised not to travel overseas

19 Mar 2020 Travel & Tourism
New Zealanders advised not to travel overseas more

Sport

The Skipper's Diary: Sir Richard Hadlee honouring his father and NZ's Forty-Niners

27 Oct 2019 Cricket By Charlotte Everett
NZNewsUK London Editor Charlotte Everett spoke to Sir Richard Hadlee about why he’s chosen to publish his father’s... more

PREVIEW: All Blacks v England semi-final

26 Oct 2019 Rugby
The two most convincing quarterfinals winners are set to square off in a semifinal showdown for the ages when the All Blacks meet old... more

Columns

Gordon Campbell on the Gareth Morgan crusade

11 Nov 2016 Opinion
Gordon Campbell on the Gareth Morgan crusade First published on Werewolf The ghastly likes of Marine Le Pen in France and Geert ... more

Gordon Campbell on the US election outcome

10 Nov 2016 Opinion
Column - Gordon Campbell   Gordon Campbell on the US election outcome Well um.. on the bright side, there (probably)... more

Kiwi Success

Congratulations to Loder Cup winner

26 Sep 2018 People By Hon Eugenie Sage
25 SEPTEMBER 2018 The Loder Cup, one of New Zealand’s oldest conservation awards, has been awarded to Robert McGowan for 2018... more

Appointments to New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO

16 Aug 2018 Appointments
16 AUGUST 2018Appointments to New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO HON JENNY SALESA Associate Education Minister Jenny Salesa is... more

Recruitment

Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers

14 Aug 2018 Recruitment By RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
14 AUGUST 2018Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers RT HON JACINDA ARDERN HON CHRIS HIPKINS Prime Minister The... more

Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers

22 Aug 2018 Recruitment By RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
14 AUGUST 2018Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers RT HON JACINDA ARDERN HON CHRIS HIPKINS Prime Minister The... more