Gordon Campbell on copyright, the Authors Guild case & TPP 23 Oct 2015
Gordon Campbell
Related articles
- Australia Jumping on the Boy Bandwagon Living
- Minister launches SmartGate in Wellington Travel
- Minister looks at court systems in Europe and UK News
- Prime Minister to travel to South Africa News
- Waitakere Mayor championsing NZ film in China Living
- Wellington Band At Top British Film Awards Living
- New Zealand-Russia begin FTA scoping discussions News
- NZ looking at all avenues on whaling issue News
- NZ manufacturing activity reaches highest since 04 Business
- Budget provides $321m for RS&T activities News
Gordon Campbell on copyright, the Authors Guild case and the TPP
A few days ago, Google finally and comprehensively won a very long-running case brought against it by the Authors Guild which had claimed that Google’s Book Project – which operates as a digital library catalogue with a few snippets of content to contextualise and focus the search – amounted to a violation of copyright. In finding in favour of Google, the US Second Court of Appeals ringingly re-stated the purpose of copyright in terms that are useful and relevant here in New Zealand. Especially now that the IP chapter of the Trans Pacific Partnership ‘trade’ deal has turned back the clock and extended the copyright term from 50 to 70 years, among other negative IP commitments. A few copyright extremists have since come out of the woodwork to defend and applaud the TPP’s IP commitments.
To the US courts, ‘fair use’ is not an exemption to be grudgingly tolerated – it is the very purpose of copyright. Here’s how the court ruling put it in the Authors Guild case:
The ultimate goal of copyright is to expand public knowledge and understanding, which copyright seeks to achieve by giving potential creators exclusive control over copying of their works, thus giving them a financial incentive to create informative, intellectually enriching works for public consumption . . . Thus, while authors are undoubtedly important intended beneficiaries of copyright, the ultimate, primary intended beneficiary is the public, whose access to knowledge copyright seeks to advance by providing rewards for authorship.
In other words, public access to an ever-increasing store of knowledge is the primary aim of copyright, and private gain is only a means to that end. (And arguably, 50 years of exclusive rights should be incentive enough for anyone.) Overall, the purpose of copyright is to promote the public good – not to maximise the length of time that an author can monetise their works. This was clearly articulated in the U.S. Constitution in its reference to copyright ie, “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts. . . .”
In a 1990s case involving an X-rated parody of the Roy Orbison song “ Oh, Pretty Woman” recorded by the 2 Live Crew rap group, the US Supreme Court came down solidly in defence of ‘fair use’ access for the purpose of parody. It proposed that an investigation of what constitutes ‘fair use’ should hinge on “whether the new work merely supersedes the objects of the original creation, or instead adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message…” And furthermore:
The majority reasoned "even if 2 Live Crew's copying of the original's first line of lyrics and characteristic opening bass riff may be said to go to the original's 'heart,' that heart is what most readily conjures up the song for parody, and it is the heart at which parody takes aim." The Supreme Court then looked to the new work as a whole, finding that 2 Live Crew thereafter departed markedly from the Orbison lyrics, producing otherwise distinctive music.
The fact that 2 Live Crew made money by copying the original was not seen by the Supreme Court as a disqualifier, partly because it couldn’t be proved – or inferred – that this parody would do any market harm to the original. Parodies, the Court ruled, will rarely substitute for the original work, since the two works serve different market functions.
But back to the Google case. It is an important one for libraries, for researchers, and for the kind of analysis based on Big Data. As Mike Masnick at Techdirt has pointed out, the US court found that the use of the search function made the Google books programme ‘transformative’ – always a key factor in defending ‘fair use’ access rights:
The purpose of Google’s copying of the original copyrighted books is to make available significant information about those books, permitting a searcher to identify those that contain a word or term of interest, as well as those that do not include reference to it. In addition, through the ngrams tool, Google allows readers to learn the frequency of usage of selected words in the aggregate corpus of published books in different historical periods. We have no doubt that the purpose of this copying is the sort of transformative purpose described in [the 2 Live Crew[case….
Was Google's snippet view of the contents ‘fair use’? Yes, the court ruled:
Google’s division of the page into tiny snippets is designed to show the searcher just enough context surrounding the searched term to help her evaluate whether the book falls within the scope of her interest (without revealing so much as to threaten the author’s copyright interests). Snippet view thus adds importantly to the highly transformative purpose of identifying books of interest to the searcher. With respect to the first factor test, it favors a finding of fair use
Arguably, these kind of searches will enable access and thus add value to the works in question – which always made the Authors Guild hostility a bit puzzling. More importantly, the fact that Google is a giant for-profit business, and is only carrying out its Google Book Project in order to make money is irrelevant, the US court ruled, as to questions of what is, or isn’t ‘ fair use.’ The court’s reasoning here was brilliantly expressed:
While we recognize that in some circumstances, a commercial motivation on the part of the secondary user will weigh against her, especially, as the Supreme Court suggested, when a persuasive transformative purpose is lacking... we see no reason in this case why Google’s overall profit motivation should prevail as a reason for denying fair use over its highly convincing transformative purpose, together with the absence of significant substitutive competition, as reasons for granting fair use. Many of the most universally accepted forms of fair use, such as news reporting and commentary, quotation in historical or analytic books, reviews of books, and performances, as well as parody, are all normally done commercially for profit. (My emphasis.)
Why is this case important? For one thing, it shows how utterly retrograde the TPP provisions on intellectual property really are. At a time when the US courts are making a case for the defence of “fair use” and “transformative” use” and are loudly re-stating the over-riding “public good” arguments for a limited copyright term, the US entertainment industry moguls – and their political cronies – are headed in the opposite direction, and are intent on maximising their commercial gains and elevating them above all other relevant issues.
The ‘free trade’ banner is being abused by these US companies to roll back the losses they’ve been suffering in court over the past decade. Regularly, the multinationals have lost even the civil actions they have taken – eg Viacom vs Youtube - over alleged copyright infringement.
Undaunted, these companies have now reverted to using the TPP to criminalise alleged copyright infringement and circumvention behaviours. The US courts may have stated the social value of a limited copyright term. Yet by using the TPP and chanting the mantra of ‘ free trade” the multinationals have effectively extended the copyright term. From 50 to 70 years. ‘Free trade’ is such a handy tool, when what you’re really doing is imposing restrictions on trade, competition and innovation.
Finally, the ability of art and science to access and use the store of knowledge as a platform for innovation is a crucial freedom in a healthy society. The last thing we should be doing is locking up knowledge and creativity for even longer terms. Within the phrase ‘intellectual property” too much emphasis is being placed on “property” as if it were private property that somehow sprang - unprompted and without precedent – from the brow of the creator.
The creative process isn’t usually like that, not even within the arts. No –one for instance, would wish to deny the genius behind a film like Goodbye Pork Pie. Yet it also had clearly recognisable genre elements – road movies, buddy movies, car race movies, and the whole Cannonball Run/Vanishing Point/Smokey and the Bear/Convoy list of cousins and ancestors. Part of the reason why audiences liked it so much was due to it being a Kiwi hybrid of those well-known conventions. Meaning : we all build on, and are inspired by what went before. Locking up copyright in perpetuity – or anything beyond 50 years – is to deny the debt that artists owe to the wellsprings of creativity.
People didn’t use to be such dogs-in-the-manger about these issues. Reportedly, Benjamin Franklin – no shrinking violet when it came to self promotion – refused to patent a stove that he’d invented, on the grounds that the invention was based on previous innovations — specifically, on theories of heat and matter articulated by Isaac Newton and the Dutch physician Hermann Boerhaave.
“That as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others,” Franklin wrote in his “Autobiography,” “we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously.”
But that’s exactly {the] point: copyrights are utilitarian things. They generate money to pay a mortgage and buy groceries and continue working. Extended too far beyond their practical usefulness, copyrights not only contradict their original intent; they also wall creators off from the sources of their inventiveness.
Genius, as the writer Lewis Hyde once said, needs to “tinker in a collective shop”. In the misleading name of ‘free’ trade, the TPP is trying to shut that shop down to new entrants.
News
Hilary Timmins' Award-Winning UK Documentary Series To Inspire NZ Students
29 Jun 2020 Education
Dream Catchers, produced and directed by Hilary Timmins, celebrates the success stories of more than thirty inspirational New... more
New Zealand reaffirms support for Flight MH17 judicial process
7 Mar 2020 News
Ahead of the start of the criminal trial in the Netherlands on 9 March, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has reaffirmed the need to... more
Business
NZ Government's Economic package to fight COVID-19
17 Mar 2020 Business News
The Coalition Government has launched the most significant peace-time economic plan in modern New Zealand history to cushion the... more
NZ Government announces aviation relief package
19 Mar 2020 Business News
Transport Minister Phil Twyford today outlined the first tranche of the $600 million aviation sector relief package announced earlier... more
Living
Diversity was Key at New Zealand Trade Tasting in London
6 Jun 2022 Food & Wine
New Zealand Winegrowers Annual Trade Tasting was recently held in London, on Wednesday 4 May, in Lindley Hall.
It was the first... more
Kiwi author stuns Behind the Butterfly Gate
12 Jan 2022 Arts
Hidden behind the Butterfly Gate is where the secret has been kept for 76 years...
New Zealand writer Merryn Corcoran’s... more
Property
Fairer rules for tenants and landlords
17 Nov 2019 Property
17 NOVEMBER 2019
The Government has delivered on its promise to the over one million New Zealanders who now rent to make it fairer... more
New Zealand Government will not implement a Capital Gains Tax
17 Apr 2019 Property
The Coalition Government will not proceed with the Tax Working Group’s recommendation for a capital gains tax, Jacinda Ardern... more
Migration
Boosting border security with electronic travel authority – now over 500,000 issued
19 Nov 2019 Migration
19 NOVEMBER 2019
We’ve improved border security with the NZeTA, New Zealand Electronic Travel Authority, which helps us to... more
Christchurch reinstated as refugee settlement location
18 Aug 2018 Migration
18 AUGUST 2018
HON IAIN LEES-GALLOWAY
The announcement that Christchurch can once again be a settlement location for refugees... more
Travel
Gallipoli Anzac Day services cancelled
19 Mar 2020 Travel & Tourism
The New Zealand and Australian Governments have announced this year’s joint Anzac Day services at Gallipoli will be cancelled... more
New Zealanders advised not to travel overseas
19 Mar 2020 Travel & Tourism
New Zealanders advised not to travel overseas
more
Sport
The Skipper's Diary: Sir Richard Hadlee honouring his father and NZ's Forty-Niners
27 Oct 2019 Cricket
NZNewsUK London Editor Charlotte Everett spoke to Sir Richard Hadlee about why he’s chosen to publish his father’s... more
PREVIEW: All Blacks v England semi-final
26 Oct 2019 Rugby
The two most convincing quarterfinals winners are set to square off in a semifinal showdown for the ages when the All Blacks meet old... more
Columns
Gordon Campbell on the Gareth Morgan crusade
11 Nov 2016 Opinion
Gordon Campbell on the Gareth Morgan crusade
First published on Werewolf
The ghastly likes of Marine Le Pen in France and Geert ... more
Gordon Campbell on the US election outcome
10 Nov 2016 Opinion
Column - Gordon Campbell
Gordon Campbell on the US election outcome
Well um.. on the bright side, there (probably)... more
Kiwi Success
Congratulations to Loder Cup winner
26 Sep 2018 People
25 SEPTEMBER 2018
The Loder Cup, one of New Zealand’s oldest conservation awards, has been awarded to Robert McGowan for 2018... more
Appointments to New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO
16 Aug 2018 Appointments
16 AUGUST 2018Appointments to New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO
HON JENNY SALESA
Associate Education Minister Jenny Salesa is... more
Recruitment
Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers
14 Aug 2018 Recruitment
14 AUGUST 2018Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers
RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
HON CHRIS HIPKINS
Prime Minister
The... more
Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers
22 Aug 2018 Recruitment
14 AUGUST 2018Historic pay equity settlement for education support workers
RT HON JACINDA ARDERN
HON CHRIS HIPKINS
Prime Minister
The... more