Tax advisers' shock at taxman's big avoidance win 5 Mar 2013
- UPDATE:Southern Cross Forest lures foreign, local interest Business
- Southern Cross Forest receiver to close mill, exit Australia Business
- Brownlee takes hard-hitting rebuild report on the chin Business
- CORRECT: Chorus faces up to $10 mln earnings hit in 2014 Business
- FMA joins probe into interest rate swap sales to farmers Business
- Chorus faces up to $10 mln earnings hit in 2014 Business
- Abano mulls rebel shareholder request for meeting Business
- Wheeler hikes OCR to 3% on inflationary pressures, eyes kiwi Business
- NZ dollar little changed before RBNZ interest rate decision Business
- Hutson, Reeves seek SGM to vote on Janes ousting from Abano Business
Article - BusinessDesk
By Pattrick Smellie
Senior tax practitioners are in shock after the Inland Revenue Department won another key tax avoidance case in the Court of Appeal, with implications for at least 16 companies and some $300 million of back tax, interest and penalties at stake.
The latest decision, issued this morning, throws out the appeal by Australian listed kitchenware maker Alesco Corp against Inland Revenue Department determinations that it owes $8.6 million on avoided tax transactions relating to its purchases of two New Zealand businesses between 2003 and 2008.
Central to Alesco's appeal were that the Commissioner of Inland Revenue had originally okayed the use of the disputed financial instruments at the heart of the case, known as optional convertible notes (OCN's), and that there was a real commercial purpose in the transactions to buy the two businesses.
However, a three judge bench led by the president of the Court of Appeal, Justice Paul O'Regan, agreed in all material respects with the High Court judgment of Justice Paul Heath, which found the way Alesco used OCN's to create a $78 million interest-free loan amounted to tax avoidance.
"The question is whether the taxpayer has truly incurred the cost as intended by Parliament," the appeal court says in its 54 page judgment, in which costs are awarded against Alesco. "Parliament did not intend that a taxpayer would be entitled to use the financial arrangements rules as a basis for claiming deductions for interest for which the taxpayer was not liable or did not pay."
Alesco's argument that it could have structured the purchases in a way that would have cost the New Zealand revenue twice as much as the OCN arrangements was irrelevant, since there was no evidence Alesco considered any other structure, as was any consideration of relevant Australian tax treatments.
The judgment provoked a stinging response from outspoken Ernst & Young tax partner Jo Doolan, who described the IRD's latest win as "an alarming result."
"As the shock waves from the Alesco decision reverberate around the tax world, taxpayers and advisers are left with even more uncertainty about the extent to which the Commissioner will go to in using the anti-avoidance provisions to essentially rewrite the tax legislation," she said.
As a country requiring foreign capital for growth, the decision "reinforces the feeling of many inbound investing corporates that the New Zealand tax environment is too uncertain."
"It may discourage them from continuing to do business here."
The IRD has been on a roll with its pursuit of major corporate tax avoidance claims through the courts since securing a $2.2 billion settlement with the four Australian-owned trading banks operating in New Zealand, in 2009.
Among other Australasian corporates caught up in similar OCN cases are Telstra Corp, Toll Holdings, and Ironbridge, the Australian owners Mediaworks, which runs the TV3 and RadioLive networks.
IRD's litigation manager Karen Whitiskie welcomed the decision.
“When Alesco New Zealand issued OCNs, with zero percent interest coupons attached, to its parent company to fund the purchase of Biolab and Robinson Industries in 2003 and claimed a deduction for 'interest' expenditure, it acted outside the intended scope of financial arrangement rules and the relevant Inland Revenue Determination,” she said.
The Court of Appeal found the fact there was a real business purpose to the transaction "will not necessarily protect a transaction from scrutiny where tax avoidance is viewed as 'a significant or actuating purpose had been pursued as a goal in itself'".
On claims the company could have structured the purchases another way, the judgment says: "It does not matter that hindsight exercised with the benefit of legal advice in 2011 suggests that interest bearing debt would have been the most fiscally beneficial funding alternative available to Alesco in 2003."
It dismissed other technical arguments saying "something more would be necessary to persuade us that words can turn a negative into a positive or a pretence into a reality."
Alesco took its tax advice on the original transactions from KPMG and use PricewaterhouseCoopers partners for expert evidence at trial - a move heavily criticised by the appeal court as part of an "increasing but unacceptable trend of resorting to experts".
PwC's Michael Schubert was particularly criticised for failing to be sufficiently objective and the use of his evidence by Alesco had added "unnecessary complication by diverting the true nature of enquiry away from the facts down unproductive paths."
In the end, the court was satisfied that the OCN arrangements were more than a merely incidental element of the Alesco purchases of New Zealand assets.
"The opposite is true," the appeal court judges ruled.
Alesco has yet to comment, but a Supreme Court appeal may be in prospect because of the wide-ranging implications of the case for other taxpayers.
"History shows the IRD will take decided cases and try to apply them more widely and aggressively than the courts may have intended," said E&Y's Doolan. "We can expect additions to the growing number of tax disputes where the IRD attacks … what were previously considered to be business as usual transactions."
23 Apr 2014 News
An East Coast iwi says they are concerned the Crown has not made good on its promise to return their wharenui – the oldest... more
23 Apr 2014 Business News
Article - BusinessDesk Equity crowd funding, latest step in much-hyped social capital, carries risks, high failure rate By... more
22 Apr 2014 Entertainment
Film and Stage Producer/Director Craig Hutchison, is pleased to be representing New Zealand at the Sunset Film Festival in Los ... more
17 Apr 2014 Entertainment
The winner of the fourth annual Taite Music Prize 2013 is Lorde for her album ‘Pure Heroine’ released on Universal Music... more
7 Apr 2014 Property
April 7 (BusinessDesk) – New Zealand property values increased at the slowest annual pace in six months in March as lower... more
23 Apr 2014 Migration
April 23 (BusinessDesk) – New Zealand migration rose to an 11-year high in March, the second-highest gain on record, as fewer... more
28 Mar 2014 Migration
Citizens of Croatia aged between 18 and 30 will soon be eligible to apply for a New Zealand Working Holiday Visa, giving them the... more
23 Apr 2014 NZ Tourism
With 9,424 extra arrivals for the 12 months to the end of March, Germany has overtaken Japan to become New Zealand’s fifth... more
22 Apr 2014 Sport
The New Zealand Open team departs today to commence their World Cup campaign in Europe. Their first assault will be on the ICF Canoe... more
23 Apr 2014 Opinion
Shane Jones has left Parliament in the manner to which we have become accustomed, with self interest coming in first and second, and... more
23 Apr 2014 Appointments
Prime Minister John Key today announced the appointment of Cheryl Gwyn as Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security. The... more
17 Apr 2014 Appointments
April 17 (BusinessDesk) – Bank of New Zealand, the local unit of Australia’s third-biggest mortgage lender, named the... more
15 Apr 2014 Recruitment
The average annual wage is expected to increase by $7,500 to around $62,200 a year by 2018 if New Zealand achieves its ... more